TAXATION OF EMPLOYEES OF EUROPEAN AND NON-EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS such as EU COMMISSION, ECB, UN, WORLD BANK and INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
International organisations for special services rendered enjoy special privileges and immunities and are not subject to the law of the country in which they are established.
Exceptions are ultra vires activities, i.e. outside the services for which they were established, which do not enjoy the special status and are instead subject to the law of the place.
Organisations have, therefore, the power to decide on their internal organisation and high officials enjoy special diplomatic immunities, while employees’ immunities are limited to the performance of their duties, but special regulations apply to them with regard to employment contracts and social security.
In general, the salaries as well as all income of members/officials/employees are subject to specific taxation in favour of the institution or organisation itself, with an exemption from the tax laws of both the country where the organisation is based, which would have an advantage in collecting the taxes of all the organisation’s employees, and in the country of origin of the employees, to avoid tax inequalities due to the different tax systems of states.
There are generally territorial or headquarters agreements between the international organisation and the host state to regulate the salaries, wages and pensions paid by organisations to their officials.
Employees totally legitimately maintain a tax residence ex lege in their home country without living there permanently.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS such as the EUROPEAN COMMISSION or the ECB
In EUROPE there is a Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union that regulates the immunities granted to officials and servants of the Union and their families and also specifies the privileges.
Salaries, wages and emoluments paid to members of the European institutions are exempt from national taxation in the Member States of the European Union.
This tax exemption is granted on the basis of Article 12 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union:
Article 13 of the Protocol specifies that the employee’s tax domicile remains in the European country where he or she was employed at the time of the assignment of the official.
These articles apply to members of the Commission, the Council and the European Court of Justice, the European Investment Bank and the European Central Bank.
If, for example, a person who was resident in Italy, or in another European country, takes up a position at the European Central Bank or ECB, he remains tax resident in Italy, or in another European country of prior residence, even though he will in fact be living in Frankfurt.
However, he is not required to pay any tax in Italy on income received at the ECB as it is exempt on the basis of Article 12 of the Protocol.
If, on the other hand, a person while resident in Belgium took up the post of official of the European Commission and transferred his registered residence to Italy, the Italian Revenue Agency with interpello 5 of 2018 and with interpello 7 of 2018 declared that the official remains with tax domicile in Belgium, even if he then transferred his residence to Italy, because that was his country of residence at the time he took up the post, as provided for by Article 13 of the above-mentioned Protocol.
Obviously, the salary paid by the European Commission is exempt from national taxation as provided for in Article 12 of the Protocol.
Moreover, the official, in this specific case, has no obligation to declare in Italy even on foreign-source income received as an employee in Belgium in the first five months of the year, prior to his appointment as a European official (having, moreover, already declared and paid tax in Belgium on that income) as he must be considered ex lege tax resident in Belgium.
The official’s spouse is also exempt from tax declaration obligations in Italy as he does not have a source of income from his own professional activity. If, on the other hand, the official’s spouse had carried out his or her own professional activity in Italy, he or she would be considered to be tax resident in Italy and required to declare the income received.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS such as the UN or United Nations, WBG or World Bank, IMF or International Monetary Fund
As far as other international organisations are concerned, the general principle of exemption from taxation of income for salaries, emoluments, allowances and pensions received as members/employees of such organisations in the performance of their duties always applies.
Members of these organisations enjoy privileges and immunities on the basis of the Vienna Convention.
Employees of the United Nations (UN), World Bank (WBG) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) are also not taxed on their salaries and are not required to pay taxes in the host country where they work.
The Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Members of the UN concluded in New York on 13 February 1946 specifies that:
This provision has full force and effect in the United States under the Bretton Woods agreements.
US citizens working at these institutions are not exempt from taxation, but a system of facilitation by the employer is applied so as not to create salary disparities.
The exemption situation also generally extends to tax monitoring obligations, although the Italian Revenue Agency has specified that it applies to individuals working abroad at international organisations with which Italy has ratified the Conventions and whose tax residence in Italy is determined ex lege.
Obviously, the exemptions do not extend to income, emoluments, interest and dividends received other than salaries received as members of international organisations.
A recent Answer No. 93/2022 of the Italian Revenue Agency has, moreover, clarified in the specific case of a German citizen employed by an organisation in Italy, who owned real estate and financial assets outside the Italian territory such as: real estate, current accounts, savings accounts, supplementary pensions, life insurance, although not registered in the National Register of the Population Resident in Italy as he was exempted from the Agreement in place with the Organisation, he was required to fill in the RW panel and to pay indirect taxes such as IVIE and IVAFE:
“These are therefore taxes which are not of a ‘direct’ nature even though the relevant
liquidation takes place through the submission of the tax return. Ne
It follows that, as they do not constitute direct taxes, they do not fall within the
referred to in subparagraph (d) of paragraph 1 of Clause 11 of the Schedule to the Agreement.
In the present case, although the Applicant is a German national, he benefits from the
the aforesaid Clause 11 of exemption from any form of direct taxation on both the
income received by the Centre and on any income from foreign sources of which he is the beneficiary
during the period of employment at the Centre (on the ground that he is not a ‘permanent
resident), having their habitual residence and the seat of their business and
social interests in our country for the greater part of the tax period, as from
2020, he must be considered tax resident in Italy and, therefore, subject to
taxed in our country for all other income not falling under the aforementioned
exemption regime as well as in relation to the obligation to pay IVIE and IVAFE.”
Even more complicated is the situation when the employee retires because he risks losing all exemption benefits on the pension itself. In fact, the Italian Revenue Agency considers that at the time of retirement all the privileges provided for by ratified international agreements lapse, except for the possibility of asserting agreements against double taxation, and that the pension is taxable in Italy and is taxed according to ordinary rules. It would be advisable in this case to assess where it is best to receive the pension.
The analysis showed how complex the situation is for employees of international organisations and how it has to be seen in all personal details and from different points of view because, even if there are exemptions, one has to look in detail at the different particularities and exceptions that often make it necessary to consult a professional to clarify and dispel doubts.